[Unistats] Full Year Enrolment Statistics

Peter Haines Peter.Haines@newcastle.edu.au
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:15:06 +1100


This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to 
consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to 
properly handle MIME multipart messages.

--Boundary_(ID_14ZnXu4+2jGuUYqmoGSARQ)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Hi all,

I'm wondering how your institution is intending to report full year enrolment/EFTSU statistics now that we have a second submission Enrolment file.  In particular, how you would deal with students who change details from one semester to the next.

As an example, we have a student who has changed their E380 value from 22 (fee-paying overseas) in semester 1, 2001 to 42 (RTS) in semester 2, 2001 (they gained permanent residency).  If we were to count the number of student/course enrolments over the entire year, by funding type, we double count this student (once as FPOS and once as RTS).  Alternatively, if we report as at a point in time (e.g. 31 March or 31 August) we fail to report them against one of the categories.  (DETYA intend to report full-year enrolments based on the student's characteristics as at 31 August.  Perhaps DETYA can expand on their intended treatment?)  If we report both Enrolments and EFTSU based on the characteristics of the student at a point in time, the EFTSU information for one of the funding types is artificially increased and the other is lost.

A compromise might be to report enrolments and EFTSU separately.  The enrolments could be reported as at 31 March, 31 August, or both.  The EFTSU could be reported separately from the enrolments, and be for the whole year because EFTSU would automatically be apportioned between funding type and any other required student characteristics that might change.  This seems to be the better solution, because it separates the point-in-time type concept of enrolments from the time-period concept of EFTSU.  However, the downside is that it then loses the comparison between enrolments and EFTSU.

I am interested in hearing your thoughts on this matter.  I'm happy to compile the individual responses into a single reference document if that is considered useful.

Cheers

Peter Haines
Senior Information Analyst
Institutional Research Unit
ph: 02 4921 6556     fax: 02 4921 6943 
http://www.newcastle.edu.au/unistats/

--Boundary_(ID_14ZnXu4+2jGuUYqmoGSARQ)--