[Muanet] MUP falls to commercial Newspeak
Dion Giles
dgiles@central.murdoch.edu.au
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 08:58:36 +0800
Independently of whether or not Melbourne University Press was delivering
value for money, I'm passing this item on as a remarkable example of the
prostitution of language. A university spending resources on publishing is
dubbed "university subsidies propping up publications". One wonders what
expenditure on teaching is called. Or on libraries. Or on
research. University subsidies propping them up? How about expenditure on
management?
Dion Giles
Uni publisher sheds staff
January 23 2003
By Larissa Dubecki, The Age
Respected scholarly publisher Melbourne University Publishing has shed
almost all of its staff as part of a commercial restructuring.
Six of its 16 staff members have taken redundancies and eight have resigned
or are being moved elsewhere at Melbourne University.
Ten new positions at MUP are being advertised, including a general manager,
sales and marketing manager and managing editors.
Staff were told they could apply for the new jobs but only two of the four
who did so were re-employed, The Age believes.
The changes coincide with the appointment of Louise Adler as chief
executive. She started last month after leaving her position as deputy
director at Melbourne University's Victorian College of the Arts.
Ms Adler is charged with implementing the recommendations of last year's
internal review into the loss-making enterprise, which operates as a
semi-independent department of the university.
MUP, which was renamed from Melbourne University Press after the review,
was split from the university's profitable bookshop.
The changes have raised fears that the commercial focus could threaten the
existence of Australia's oldest academic publisher, which started in 1923
and produces about 50 books a year.
Ms Adler said MUP would help academics commercialise their often arcane
research.
The restructured MUP will also place a new emphasis on electronic publishing.
Former MUP director Brian Wilder, writing in The Age last year, said: "It
was not set up to be a profit-oriented operation."
Mr Wilder, who is retiring from his position of MUP commissioning editor
next month, questioned whether the publisher could be commercially
successful divorced from the bookshop arm.
But Ms Adler said a careful selection process would mean that the
university subsidies propping up publications would no longer be needed.